Arteriovenous Fistula Salvage, Durability, and Probable Loss in Renal Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques

Main Article Content

Joab Ulises Calderón Barrientos
Melissa Delgado Cardona
Leslie Guerrero Álvarez
Victor Gabriel Bartolo Ponce
Ivan Matías Maldonado Ventura

Abstract





Background: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) remain the gold standard for hemodialysis access in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. However, AVF failure, whether due to thrombosis, stenosis, or maturation failure, poses significant challenges in clinical nephrology and vascular surgery. This review examines the factors influencing AVF salvageability, durability, and probable loss, while evaluating contemporary management strategies.


Methods: A systematic analysis of peer-reviewed literature was conducted, focusing on AVF patency rates, surgical revision techniques, endovascular interventions (angioplasty, stenting, thrombolysis), and predictors of long-term functionality.


Results: Studies indicate that early detection of AVF dysfunction and prompt intervention significantly enhance salvage rates. Factors such as venous stenosis, inadequate inflow, and patient comorbidities (diabetes, atherosclerosis) critically impact AVF longevity. Endovascular approaches demonstrate high initial success, but surgical revision may offer superior durability in select cases.


Conclusion: Optimizing AVF survival requires a multidisciplinary approach, integrating surveillance protocols, timely interventions, and patient-specific risk stratification. Further research is needed to refine predictive models for AVF loss and improve minimally invasive salvage techniques.





Article Details

How to Cite
Joab Ulises Calderón Barrientos, Melissa Delgado Cardona, Leslie Guerrero Álvarez, Victor Gabriel Bartolo Ponce, and Ivan Matías Maldonado Ventura. 2025. “Arteriovenous Fistula Salvage, Durability, and Probable Loss in Renal Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Techniques”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 5 (6):1011-18. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v5-i06-37.
Section
Articles

References

I. C. Lok, T. Huber, T. Lee, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 Update Am J Kidney Dis, 75 (2020), pp. S1-S164, 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.001

II. J. Schmidli, M.K. Widmer, C. Basile, et al. Editor's choice - Vascular access: 2018 clinical practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 55 (2018), pp. 757-818, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.001

III. J. Almasri, M. Alsawas, M. Mainou, et al. Outcomes of vascular access for hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg, 64 (2016), pp. 236-243, 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.053

IV. R. Coscas, N. Petrica, Z. Massy, J. Jayet, J. De Launay. Readmissions following arteriovenous access creation for haemodialysis in a French National Database. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 64 (2022), pp. 703-710, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.08.013

V. K.J. Woodside, S. Bell, P. Mukhopadhyay, et al.Arteriovenous fistula maturation in prevalent hemodialysis patients in the United States: a national study. Am J Kidney Dis, 71 (2018), pp. 793-801, 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.11.020

VI. K.P. McCullough, H. Morgenstern, R. Saran, W.H. Herman, B.M. Robinson Projecting ESRD incidence and prevalence in the United States through 2030. J Am Soc Nephrol, 30 (2019), pp. 127-135, 10.1681/ASN.2018050531

VII. K. Woo, D.P. Goldman, J.A. Romley Early failure of dialysis access among the elderly in the Era of fistula first. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 10 (2015), pp. 1791-1798, 10.2215/CJN.09040914

VIII. K. Woo, L. Gascue, K. Norris, E. Lin. Patient frailty and functional use of hemodialysis vascular access: a retrospective study of the US renal data system Am J Kidney Dis, 80 (2022), pp. 30-45,

1053/j.ajkd.2021.10.011

IX. M.J. Brescia, J.E. Cimino, K. Appel, B.J. Hurwich Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula N Engl J Med, 275 (1966), pp. 1089-1092,

1056/NEJM196611172752002

X. K.B. Quencer, M. Arici. Arteriovenous fistulas and their characteristic sites of stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 205 (2015), pp. 726-734,

2214/ajr.15.14650

XI. G.A. Beathard, C.E. Lok, M.H. Glickman, et al. Definitions and end points for interventional studies for arteriovenous dialysis access Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 13 (2018), pp. 501-512,

2215/cjn.11531116

XII. J. Malik, V. Tuka, Z. Kasalova, et al.Understanding the dialysis access steal syndrome. A review of the etiologies, diagnosis, prevention and treatment strategies. J Vasc Access, 9 (2008), pp. 155-166

XIII. H. Duncan, L. Ferguson, I. Faris. Incidence of the radial steal syndrome in patients with Brescia fistula for hemodialysis: its clinical significance. J Vasc Surg, 4 (1986), pp. 144-147

XIV. W.C. Jennings, A. Mallios, N. Mushtaq Proximal radial artery arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis vascular access. J Vasc Surg, 67 (2018), pp. 244-253, 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.114

XV. P.E. Miller, A. Tolwani, C.P. Luscy, et al.. Predictors of adequacy of arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int, 56 (1999), pp. 275-280, 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00515.x

XVI. T.S. Huber, S.A. Berceli, S.T. Scali, et al. Arteriovenous fistula maturation, functional patency, and intervention rates. JAMA Surg, 156 (2021), pp. 1111-1119

XVII. P.P. Rooijens, J.H. Tordoir, T. Stijnen, J.P. Burgmans, A.A. de Smet, T.I. Yo Radiocephalic wrist arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis: meta-analysis indicates a high primary failure rate Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 28 (2004), pp. 583-589, 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.08.014