Microsurgical Revascularization in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Implant-Based Plastic Surgery: Techniques, Outcomes, and Clinical Implications
Main Article Content
Abstract
The integration of microsurgical revascularization techniques in aesthetic and reconstructive implant-based plastic surgery has revolutionized the field, offering enhanced outcomes in both functional and aesthetic dimensions. This article explores the application of microsurgical methods, particularly in the context of revascularizing autologous and alloplastic implants, to optimize graft survival, reduce complications, and improve long-term results. By leveraging advanced microvascular anastomosis, surgeons can address challenges such as implant ischemia, capsular contracture, and soft tissue necrosis, which are critical in achieving patient satisfaction and surgical success. This review synthesizes current evidence, surgical protocols, and case studies to highlight the efficacy of microsurgical revascularization in complex aesthetic and reconstructive scenarios. Furthermore, it discusses the implications of these techniques for patient selection, preoperative planning, and postoperative care, providing a comprehensive framework for plastic surgeons aiming to incorporate microsurgery into their practice.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Sadok N., Krabbe-Timmerman I.S., Buisman N.H., van Aalst V.C., de Bock G.H., Werker P.M.N. Short-term Quality of Life after Autologous Compared to Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study. Plaaast Reconstr. Surg. 2023 doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010496. online ahead of print .
II. Atamian E.K., Suydam R., Hardy T.N., Clappier M., Barnett S., Caulfield D., Jelavic M., Smith M.L., Tanna N. Financial Implications of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2023;90:S607–S611.
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003412.
III. Fracol M.E., Rodriguez M.M., Clemens M.W. A Spectrum of Disease: Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Atypicals, and Other Implant Associations. Clin. Plast. Surg. 2023;50:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2022.12.001.
IV. Martin J., di Summa P.G., Raffoul W., Koch N. Breast Reconstruction: Economic Impact Swiss Health Insurance System. Medicines. 2022;9:64. doi: 10.3390/medicines9120064.
V. Fertsch S., Munder B., Andree C., Witzel C., Stambera P., Schulz T., Hagouan M., Gruter L., Aufmesser B., Staemmler K., et al. Risk Factor Analysis for Flap and Donor Site Related Complications in 1274 DIEP Flaps—Retrospective Single Center Study. Chirurgia. 2021;116((Suppl. S2)):5–15. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.116.2Suppl.S5.
VI. Patel N.G., Rozen W.M., Chow W.T., Chowdhry M., Fitzgerald O’Connor E., Sharma H., Griffiths M., Ramakrishnan V.V. Stacked and bipedicled abdominal free flaps for breast reconstruction: Considerations for shaping. Gland. Surg. 2016;5:115–121.
doi:10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2016.02.03.
VII. Blondeel P.N., Hijjawi J., Depypere H., Roche N., Van Landuyt K. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: An easy three-step principle. Part IV—Aesthetic breast surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009;124:372–382.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aeeb21.
VIII. Chae M.P., Rozen W.M., Patel N.G., Hunter-Smith D.J., Ramakrishnan V. Enhancing breast projection in autologous reconstruction using the St Andrew’s coning technique and 3D volumetric analysis. Gland. Surg. 2017;6:706–714.
doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.06.01.
IX. Razzano S., Marongiu F., Wade R., Figus A. Optimizing DIEP Flap Insetting for Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study of Patient-Reported Aesthetic Outcomes. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2019;143:261e–270e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005277.
X. Holm C., Mayr M., Hofter E., Ninkovic M. Perfusion zones of the DIEP flap revisited: A clinical study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2006;117:37–43. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000185867.84172.c0.
XI. Ali R.S., Garrido A., Ramakrishnan V. Stacked free hemi-DIEP flaps: A method of autologous breast reconstruction in a patient with midline abdominal scarring. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2002;55:351–353. doi: 10.1054/bjps.2002.3834.
XII. Pulzl P., Schoeller T., Wechselberger G. Respecting the aesthetic unit in autologous breast reconstruction improves the outcome. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2006;117:1685–1691; discussion 1683–1692.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000218334.31351.4f.
XIII. Liao H.T., Cheng M.H., Ulusal B.G., Wei F.C. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for successful simultaneous breast and chest wall reconstruction in a Poland anomaly patient. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2005;55:422–426.
doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000171424.77066.22.
XIV. Cheng M.H., Robles J.A., Ulusal B.G., Wei F.C. Reliability of zone IV in the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: A single center’s experience with 74 cases. Breast. 2006;15:158–166.
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2005.06.006.
XV. Williams E.H., Rosenberg L.Z., Kolm P., de la Torre J.I., Fix R.J. Immediate nipple reconstruction on a free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2007;120:1115–1124.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000279142.46729.94.
XVI. Patel A.J., Kulkarni M., O’Broin E.S. A TRAM flap design refinement for use in delayed breast reconstruction. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2009;62:1135–1139.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.03.015.
XVII. Scholz T., Kretsis V., Kobayashi M.R., Evans G.R.D. Long-term outcomes after primary breast reconstruction using a vertical skin pattern for skin-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr. Surg. 2008;122:1603–1611.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9a0a.