Anatomy of the Cystic Artery and Its Variations: Implications for Gallbladder Surgery

Main Article Content

Sergio Morales Acosta*
Angel Rivera Doroteo
Nancy Andrea Juárez Ferrusquia
Yomar Frayser Rivera Inga
Yair Roberto Orbe Salmerón
Jesús Andrés Zambada Montaño
Miranda Valeria Valdez Espinoza

Abstract

Anatomical variations of the hepatobiliary arterial supply represent a significant challenge during gallbladder surgery, as they may increase the risk of hemorrhage and bile duct injury when not recognized promptly. Among these, hepatic arterial variations described by the Michels classification are particularly relevant because of their impact on the planning and performance of hepatobiliary procedures. We present the case of a 48-year-old male patient diagnosed with acute calculous cholecystitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During dissection of the hepatocystic triangle, a vascular variant corresponding to Michels type V was identified, characterized by the presence of an accessory left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery. Intraoperative recognition of this variant allowed modification of the surgical strategy, preservation of the accessory vessel, and successful completion of the procedure without vascular or biliary complications. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged the following day with outpatient follow-up demonstrating no evidence of complications. This case highlights the importance of thorough knowledge of hepatobiliary vascular anatomy, the Michels classification, and the systematic application of the Critical View of Safety to reduce the risk of iatrogenic injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of recognizing anatomical variations as a fundamental element for optimizing surgical safety and improving clinical outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Acosta*, Sergio Morales, Angel Rivera Doroteo, Nancy Andrea Juárez Ferrusquia, Yomar Frayser Rivera Inga, Yair Roberto Orbe Salmerón, Jesús Andrés Zambada Montaño, and Miranda Valeria Valdez Espinoza. 2026. “Anatomy of the Cystic Artery and Its Variations: Implications for Gallbladder Surgery”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 6 (10):1939-44. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v6-i10-01.
Section
Articles

References

I. Andall, R. G., Matusz, P., du Plessis, M., Ward, R., Tubbs, R. S., & Loukas, M. (2016). The clinical anatomy of cystic artery variations: A review of over 9800 cases. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 38(5), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1600-y

II. Asghar, A., Priya, A., Prasad, N., Patra, A., & Agrawal, D. (2024). Variations in morphology of cystic artery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. La Clinica Terapeutica, 175(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2024.5061

III. Triantafyllou, K., et al. (2024). Surgical anatomy of the cystic artery: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Annals of Anatomy, 256, 152343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2024.152343

IV. Michels, N. A. (1951). The hepatic, cystic and retroduodenal arteries and their relations to the biliary ducts, with samples of the entire celiac arterial supply. Annals of Surgery, 133(4), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-195104000-00009

V. Michels, N. A. (1966). Newer anatomy of the liver and its variant blood supply and collateral circulation. New York, NY: Hoeber Medical Division, Harper & Row.

VI. Hiatt, J. R., Gabbay, J., & Busuttil, R. W. (1994). Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. Annals of Surgery, 220(1), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199407000-00008

VII. Noussios, G., Dimitriou, I., Chatzis, I., & Katsourakis, A. (2017). The main anatomic variations of the hepatic artery and their importance in surgical practice: Review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 9(4), 248–252. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2902w

VIII. Dandekar, U., Dandekar, K., Chavan, S., & Ghodke, B. (2016). Cystic artery: Morphological study and surgical significance. Anatomy Research International, 2016, 7201858. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7201858

IX. Mlakar, B., Gadzijev, E. M., Ravnik, D., & Hribernik, M. (2003). Anatomical variations of the cystic artery. European Journal of Morphology, 41(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1076/EJOM.41.1.31.28103

X. Komatsu, T., Matsui, O., Kadoya, M., Yoshikawa, J., Gabata, T., & Takashima, T. (1999). Cystic artery origin of the segment V hepatic artery. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 22(2), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900357

XI. Sabaa, L., & Mallarini, G. (2008). Multidetector row CT angiography in the evaluation of the hepatic artery and its anatomical variants. Clinical Radiology, 63(3), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.023

XII. Mugunthan, N., Kannan, R., Jebakani, C. F., & Anbalagan, J. (2016). Variations in the origin and course of the right hepatic artery and its surgical significance. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 10(9), AC01–AC04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/22126.8428

XIII. Asghar, A., Priya, A., Patra, A., Gupta, P., & Kumar, A. (2023). Moynihan's hump of the right hepatic artery in Calot's triangle: A systematic review and meta-analysis of its incidence and surgical importance. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 45, 643–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03125-8

XIV. Strasberg, S. M., Hertl, M., & Soper, N. J. (1995). An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 180(1), 101–125.

XV. Hugh, T. B., Kelly, M. D., & Li, B. (1992). Laparoscopic anatomy of the cystic artery. American Journal of Surgery, 163(6), 593–595.

Most read articles by the same author(s)