The Rivera Condom in the Management of Complicated Open Abdomen: A Case Report

Main Article Content

Julio Cesar Ortega Maria
Flávio Antônio de Sá Ribeiro
Luis Fernández de Córdova Rio de la Loza

Abstract

The hostile abdomen represents one of the most challenging scenarios in general surgery and is characterized by loss of normal anatomical planes, dense adhesions, persistent inflammation, and fibrosis, generally secondary to infectious processes, multiple surgical interventions, or severe abdominal complications. The development of intestinal fistulas in the setting of an open abdomen considerably increases morbidity and mortality due to continuous wound contamination, fluid and electrolyte losses, nutritional deterioration, and the risk of sepsis. The Rivera condom technique represents an alternative approach for the isolation and drainage of intestinal effluent in patients with fistulas and a complex abdomen. We present the case of a 15-year-old male patient with a history of complicated appendicitis who, following surgical treatment and subsequent abdominal complications, developed a hostile abdomen associated with intestinal fistulas. Because of the severe inflammatory response, extensive adhesions, and loss of normal anatomical planes, further surgical intervention posed a high risk of visceral injury and the development of additional fistulas. Given the difficulty in controlling the intestinal effluent, the Rivera condom technique was used, with the devices positioned over the fistulous openings to isolate and direct the effluent externally, thereby reducing its contact with the wound surface and facilitating local management of the open abdomen. Control of intestinal effluent is one of the fundamental principles in the management of fistulas associated with a hostile abdomen and should be integrated into a multidisciplinary approach that includes sepsis control, fluid and electrolyte replacement, nutritional support, tissue protection, and planning for eventual definitive reconstruction. The Rivera condom technique represents a simple, adaptable, and low-cost alternative that enables individual isolation of fistulous openings and controlled drainage of intestinal contents, particularly when wound characteristics limit the use of conventional devices. In the present case, this technique provided adequate isolation of intestinal effluent in an adolescent patient with a complicated open abdomen following appendicitis, representing a useful tool within the staged management of a highly complex surgical condition.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ortega Maria, Julio Cesar, Flávio Antônio de Sá Ribeiro, and Luis Fernández de Córdova Rio de la Loza. 2026. “The Rivera Condom in the Management of Complicated Open Abdomen: A Case Report”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 6 (8):1687-94. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v6-i8-11.
Section
Articles

References

I. Rivera Pérez, M. Á., Quezada González, B. K., Quiñónez Espinoza, M., & Almada Valenzuela, R. R. (2017). Manejo de estomas complicados y/o abdomen hostil con la técnica de condón de Rivera: Diez años de experiencia. Cirujano General, 39(2), 82–92.

II. Coccolini, F., Roberts, D., Ansaloni, L., Ivatury, R., Gamberini, E., Kluger, Y., Moore, E. E., Coimbra, R., Kirkpatrick, A. W., Pereira, B. M., Montori, G., Ceresoli, M., Abu-Zidan, F. M., Sartelli, M., Weber, D., Fraga, G., Naidoo, N., Moore, F. A., Zanini, N., ... Catena, F. (2018). The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 13, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0167-4

III. Björck, M., Bruhin, A., Cheatham, M., Hinck, D., Kaplan, M., Manca, G., Wild, T., & Windsor, A. (2009). Classification—Important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen. World Journal of Surgery, 33(6), 1154–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-9996-3

IV. Boele van Hensbroek, P., Wind, J., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., Busch, O. R. C., & Goslings, J. C. (2009). Temporary closure of the open abdomen: A systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World Journal of Surgery, 33(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9867-3

V. Atema, J. J., Gans, S. L., & Boermeester, M. A. (2015). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients. World Journal of Surgery, 39(4), 912–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6

VI. Gribovskaja-Rupp, I., & Melton, G. B. (2016). Enterocutaneous fistula: Proven strategies and updates. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 29(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1580732

VII. Tuma, F., Crespi, Z., Wolff, C. J., Daniel, D. T., & Nassar, A. K. (2020). Enterocutaneous fistula: A simplified clinical approach. Cureus, 12(4), e7789. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7789

VIII. Terzi, C., Egeli, T., Canda, A. E., & Arslan, N. C. (2014). Management of enteroatmospheric fistulae. International Wound Journal, 11(Suppl. 1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12288

IX. Bobkiewicz, A., Walczak, D., Smoliński, S., Kasprzyk, T., Studniarek, A., Borejsza-Wysocki, M., Ratajczak, A., Marciniak, R., Drews, M., & Banasiewicz, T. (2017). Management of enteroatmospheric fistula with negative pressure wound therapy in open abdomen treatment: A multicentre observational study. International Wound Journal, 14(1), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12597

X. Coccolini, F., Ceresoli, M., Kluger, Y., Kirkpatrick, A., Montori, G., Salvetti, F., Fugazzola, P., Tomasoni, M., Sartelli, M., Ansaloni, L., Catena, F., et al. (2019). Open abdomen and entero-atmospheric fistulae: An interim analysis from the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA). Injury, 50(1), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.040

XI. Kumpf, V. J., de Aguilar-Nascimento, J. E., Diaz-Pizarro Graf, J. I., Hall, A. M., McKeever, L., Steiger, E., & Winkler, M. F. (2017). ASPEN-FELANPE clinical guidelines: Nutrition support of adult patients with enterocutaneous fistula. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 41(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607116680792

XII. Bleier, J. I. S., & Hedrick, T. (2010). Metabolic support of the enterocutaneous fistula patient. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 23(3), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262981

XIII. Orangio, G. R. (2010). Enterocutaneous fistula: Medical and surgical management including patients with Crohn's disease. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 23(3), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1262984

XIV. Kňazovický, M., Kováč, I., Romžová, B., Šimon, R., et al. (2026). Contemporary management of the open abdomen: Standards, challenges, and future directions. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 411, 184.

XV. Vagholkar, K. (2026). Contemporary management of the open abdomen: A critical narrative review of evidence, techniques, and outcomes. Asian Journal of Research in Surgery, 9(2), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrs/2026/v9i2410

Most read articles by the same author(s)