H-Plasty Reconstruction of a Traumatic Frontal Avulsion: A Case Report
Main Article Content
Abstract
Traumatic forehead avulsion with calvarial exposure poses a reconstructive challenge in young children because the frontal skin is relatively inelastic and repair must preserve vascularity, facial symmetry, and future growth. We report a three-year-old girl who sustained a motorcycle-related craniofacial injury producing an approximately 8 × 4 cm left frontal soft-tissue defect, partial periosteal loss, exposed frontal bone, necrotic wound edges, gross contamination, and a unicortical frontal-bone fracture. Initial irrigation, debridement, traumatic-flap remodeling, and primary closure were followed by epidermolysis and skin necrosis with recurrent bone exposure. A second-stage reconstruction was therefore performed using bilateral opposing advancement flaps configured as an H-plasty. The flaps incorporated the galea and were elevated in a supraperiosteal plane to preserve the remaining periosteum and regional vascular supply. Layered closure was completed with 6-0 absorbable polydioxanone skin sutures. At postoperative days 6 and 10, the flap remained viable and provided complete coverage with a satisfactory early aesthetic and functional result. This case illustrates that H-plasty can provide vascularized, like-with-like coverage for selected traumatic pediatric forehead defects when careful debridement, broad-based flap design, tension redistribution, and preservation of the supratrochlear and supraorbital vascular territories are prioritized.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Jang HU, Choi YW. Scalp reconstruction: a 10-year experience. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2020;21(4):237–243. doi:10.7181/acfs.2020.00269.
II. Miccio L, Mioso G. Bilateral advancement O-to-H flap or H-plasty. Dermatol Rep. 2023;15(2):9673. doi:10.4081/dr.2023.9673.
III. Krishna D, Khan MM, Dubepuria R, Chaturvedi G, Cheruvu VPR. Reconstruction of scalp and forehead defects: options and strategies. Cureus.
;15(7):e41479. doi:10.7759/cureus.41479.
IV. Redondo P. Simplifying forehead and temple reconstruction: a narrative review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(16):5399. doi:10.3390/jcm12165399.
V. Schopper HK, Kriet JD. Advancement flaps. Plast Aesthet Res. 2022;9:5.
doi:10.20517/23479264.2021.72.
VI. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D; CARE Group. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. J Med Case Rep. 2013;7:223.
doi:10.1186/1752-1947-7-223.
VII. Ebrahimi A, Nejadsarvari N. Upper forehead skin reconstruction with H-flap. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013;6(3):152–154. doi:10.4103/0974-2077.118415.
VIII. Rose V, Overstall S, Moloney DM, Powell BWE. The H-flap: a useful flap for forehead reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54(8):705–707.
doi:10.1054/bjps.2001.3689.