Clinical Characteristics, Angiographic Features, And Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Bridging: A Retrospective Study in Myanmar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background
Myocardial bridging (MB) is a congenital anomaly where an epicardial coronary artery tunnels intramuscularly. Though traditionally considered a benign variant, its clinical relevance remains controversial, particularly regarding the risk of early hospital readmission and symptom burden in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a 700-Bedded Hospital in Pyin Oo Lwin, reviewing 600 consecutive diagnostic coronary angiograms performed from January 2021 to December 2024. Patients with isolated MB—defined as systolic compression of 50% or greater without concomitant atherosclerosis—were evaluated against a propensity-matched control group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) at 12 months.
Results
Isolated MB was identified in 21 patients (3.5% prevalence). The cohort was predominantly male (81%) with a mean age of 49 ± 11 years. The left anterior descending artery was involved in 95% of cases. At 12 months, the MB group exhibited a significantly higher MACE incidence compared to controls (14.3% vs. 2.4%; p=0.04). Crucially, this difference was driven entirely by recurrent hospitalizations for unstable angina (14.3% vs. 2.4%; p=0.03). There were zero cases of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or revascularization. Multivariable Cox regression identified bridge length exceeding 25 mm as an independent predictor of symptom recurrence.
Conclusions
Isolated MB demonstrates excellent short-term survival but notable morbidity. The high rate of recurrent angina requiring hospitalization within one year indicates routine reassurance is insufficient. Symptomatic patients necessitate optimized medical therapy and close monitoring to effectively prevent early readmissions.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Ferreira AG Jr, Trotter SE, König B Jr, Décourt LV, Fox K, Olsen EG: Myocardial bridges: morphological and functional aspects. Heart. 1991, 66:364-367. PMID: 1747296.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.66.5.364.
II. Tarantini G, Migliore F, Cademartiri F, Fraccaro C, Iliceto S : Left Anterior Descending Artery Myocardial Bridging: A Clinical Approach. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2016, 68 (25):2887-2899. PMID: 28007148. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.973.
III. Reyman HC: Dissertatio de vasis cordis propriis. Bibl Anat. 1737, 2:359-78.
IV. Porstmann W, Iwig J: Intramural coronary vessels in the angiogram. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed. 1960, 92:129-33. PMID: 14434245.
V. Ishikawa Y, Akasaka Y, Suzuki K, et al.: Anatomic properties of myocardial bridge predisposing to myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2009, 4:376-83. PMID: 19620504.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820720.
VI. Corban MT, Hung OY, Eshtehardi P, et al.: Myocardial bridging: contemporary understanding of pathophysiology with implications for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014, 63:2346-2355. PMID: 24583304.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.049.
VII. Zhu C, Wang S, Cui H, Tang B, Wang S: Associations of myocardial bridging with adverse cardiac events: a meta-analysis of published observational cohort studies involving 4,556 individuals. Ann Transl Med. 2020, 8:369. PMID: 32355813. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.24.
VIII. Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, et al.: Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. . J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013, 62:1639-1653. PMID: 23954338.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.076.
IX. Ge J, Erbel R, Rupprecht HJ, Koch L, Kearney P, Görge G, Haude M: Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiography in the assessment of myocardial bridging. Circulation. 1994, 89:1725-32. PMID: 8149538. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1725.
X. Schwarz ER, Klues HG, vom Dahl J, Klein I, Krebs W, Hanrath P : Functional characteristics of myocardial bridging. A combined angiographic and intracoronary Doppler flow study. Eur Heart J. 1997, 18:434-442. PMID: 9076380.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015263.
XI. Ishikawa Y, Ishii T, Asuwa N, Masuda S : Absence of atherosclerosis evolution in the coronary arterial segment covered by myocardial tissue in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Virchows Arch. 1997, 430:163-71. PMID: 9083520.
doi: 10.1007/BF01008038.
XII. Bourassa MG, Butnaru A, Lespérance J, Tardif JC : Symptomatic myocardial bridges: overview of ischemic mechanisms and current diagnostic and treatment strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003, 41:351-9. PMID: 12575960. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02768-7.
XIII. Abdou M: Myocardial bridging causing ischemia and recurrent chest pain: a case report. Int Arch Med Int Arch Med 4, 24. 2011, 4:24. PMID: 21736718. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-4-24.
XIV. Hongo Y, Tada H, Ito K, Yasumura Y, Miyatake K, Yamagishi M : Augmentation of vessel squeezing at coronary-myocardial bridge by nitroglycerin: study by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J. 1999, 138:345-50. PMID: 10426850. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70123-7.
XV. Ripa C, Melatini MC, Olivieri F, Antonicelli R : Myocardial bridging: A 'forgotten' cause of acute coronary syndrome - a case report. Int J Angiol. 2007, 16:115-8. PMID: 22477305. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278262.
XVI. Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): a randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival data. Circulation. 1983, 68:939-50. PMID: 6137292. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.68.5.939.
XVII. Cavalcanti JS, de Lucena Oliveira M, Pais e Melo AV Jr, Balaban G, de Andrade Oliveira CL, de Lucena Oliveira E. Anatomic variations of the coronary arteries. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1995 Dec;65(6):489-92. Portuguese. PMID: 8731301.
XVIII. Evbayekha E O, Nwogwugwu E, Olawoye A, et al.: A Comprehensive Review of Myocardial Bridging: Exploring Diagnostic and Treatment Modalities. Cureus. 2023, 15(8):e43132. PMID: 37692750.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43132.
XIX. Sawhney R, Christensen J, Schaffer J, Al-Azizi K : Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Myocardial Bridging. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 2022, 2:100563. PMID:39129813. doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100563.
XX. Haager PK, Schwarz ER, vom Dahl J, Klues HG, Reffelmann T, Hanrath P : Long term angiographic and clinical follow up in patients with stent implantation for symptomatic myocardial bridging. Heart. 2000, 84:403-8. PMID: 10995410.
doi: 10.1136/heart.84.4.403.
XXI. Lee MS, Chen CH: Myocardial Bridging: An Up-to-Date Review. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015, 27:521-8. PMID: 25999138.
XXII. Ge J, Jeremias A, Rupp A, et al.: New signs characteristic of myocardial bridging demonstrated by intracoronary ultrasound and Doppler. Eur Heart J. 1999, 20:1707-16. PMID: 10562478.
doi:10.1053/euhj.1999.1661.