Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome Revisited: Expanding the Genotypic Spectrum, Deciphering RECQL4-Related Pathomechanisms, And Redefining Long-Term Surveillance Strategies for An Underrecognized Genodermatosis

Main Article Content

Ilse Nájera Basurto
Jonathan Guzmán Rodríguez
Josselin Rocha Martinez
María Fernanda Murillo González
María José Soto Martínez
Alejandra Guerrero García

Abstract

Rothmund-Thomson syndrome (RTS) represents a paradigm of the intricate intersection between dermatologic phenomics, genomic instability, and oncologic predisposition. This comprehensive review synthesizes current knowledge regarding this ultra-rare autosomal recessive genodermatosis, which classically manifests with the pathognomonic triad of poikiloderma, juvenile cataracts, and skeletal dysplasias, while conferring a substantially elevated lifetime risk for osteosarcoma and cutaneous malignancies. Over the past decade, significant nosological refinement has emerged from the elucidation of biallelic pathogenic variants in RECQL4 and ANAPC1 as the primary molecular etiologies underlying RTS type 2 and type 1, respectively. However, the recent identification of DNA2 and CRIPT variants in affected individuals without identifiable alterations in the canonical genes has further unraveled the genetic heterogeneity of this condition, challenging traditional classification paradigms and expanding the continuum of RECQL4-related disorders. We critically examine the evolving landscape of RTS molecular diagnostics, emphasizing the genotype-phenotype correlations that distinguish RECQL4-associated multisystemic involvement—characterized by radial ray defects, patellar hypoplasia, and a striking predisposition to osteosarcoma—from the ANAPC1-related subtype wherein cataracts predominate without malignant transformation. The role of RECQL4 as a cornerstone of genomic maintenance through its participation in replication fork stabilization, double-strand break repair, and telomere homeostasis is explored in depth, providing mechanistic insights into the cellular fragility that underlies the premature aging phenotype and neoplastic progression. Current evidence regarding surveillance protocols, including the contentious role of routine imaging for osteosarcoma screening and the utility of pulsed dye laser therapy for telangiectatic lesions, is critically appraised. Furthermore, we highlight emerging therapeutic avenues, including the potential for targeted DNA damage response modulation and the importance of genotype-informed cancer risk stratification. By integrating the most recent case series, molecular discoveries, and longitudinal outcome data, this review aims to provide clinicians with a practical framework for early recognition, diagnostic confirmation, and multidisciplinary management of this often-elusive syndrome, while identifying critical knowledge gaps that warrant future investigation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Basurto, Ilse Nájera, Jonathan Guzmán Rodríguez, Josselin Rocha Martinez, María Fernanda Murillo González, María José Soto Martínez, and Alejandra Guerrero García. 2026. “Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome Revisited: Expanding the Genotypic Spectrum, Deciphering RECQL4-Related Pathomechanisms, And Redefining Long-Term Surveillance Strategies for An Underrecognized Genodermatosis”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 6 (07):1281-89. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v6-i7-04.
Section
Articles

References

I. Ho SKL, Tong GPY, Leung LT, Cheng SSW, Fu ECH, Lo IFM, et al. RECQL4-related Rothmund-Thomson syndrome: A case series and literature review. Cancer Genet. 2025;292-293:131-136.

II. Wang LL, Plon SE. Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1999 Oct 6 [updated 2020 Jun 4].

III. Larizza L, Roversi G, Volpi L. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:2.

IV. Martins DJ, Di Lazzaro Filho R, Bertola DR, Hoch NC. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, a disorder far from solved. Front Aging. 2023;4:1292691.

V. Vennos EM, James WD. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome: review of the world literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;27(5 Pt 1):750-762.

VI. Orphanet. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome [Internet]. Paris: Orphanet; 2025 [cited 2026 May 11]. Available from: https://www.orpha.net/en/disease/detail/2909

VII. Piquero-Casals J, Okubo AY, Nico MM. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome in three siblings and development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Pediatr Dermatol. 2002;19(4):312-316.

VIII. Hafner J, Trueb RM. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. In: Hafner J, Trueb RM, editors. Management of Rare Skin Diseases. Berlin: Springer; 2020. p. 145-152.

IX. Potozkin JR, Geronemus RG. Treatment of the poikilodermatous component of the Rothmund-Thomson syndrome with the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser: a case report. Pediatr Dermatol. 1991;8(2):162-165.

X. Kaufmann S, Jones KL, Peabody J, Tolo V. Growth hormone deficiency in the Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1985;23(4):861-868.

XI. Unraveling syndrome-driven osteosarcoma: genetic insights and therapeutic frontiers. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2026;21:45.

XII. Porter WM, Hardman CM, Creamer D, Morar N, Whittaker SJ. Haematological disease in siblings with Rothmund-Thomson syndrome. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1999;24(6):452-454.

XIII. Pianigiani E, De Aloe G, Andreassi A, Fimiani M. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome (Thomson-type) and myelodysplasia. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001;18(5):422-425.

XIV. Simons A, Kallenberg CGM, de Vries EGE. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome and malignant disease. A case report and review of the literature. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1982;7(5):455-460.

XV. Mackay HL, Stone HR, Ellis K, Ronson GE, Walker AK, Starowicz K, et al. USP50 suppresses alternative RecQ helicase use and deleterious DNA2 activity during replication. bioRxiv. 2024.

XVI. Alsabbagh MM. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome: A review of clinical and molecular aspects. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg. 2020;24(1):5-11.

XVII. Gilissen C, Hoischen A, Brunner HG, Veltman JA. Disease gene identification strategies for exome sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20(5):490-497.

XVIII. Ripperger T, Bielack SS, Borkhardt A, Brecht IB, Burkhardt B, Calaminus G, et al. Update on Recommendations for Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Children with Genomic Instability Disorders. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;30(22):5009-5020.

XIX. Colombo EA, Fontana L, Roversi G, Catusi I, Garzo M, Baldo C, et al. ANAPC1 mutations cause a Rothmund-Thomson syndrome-like condition. Clin Genet. 2019;96(5):418-428.

XX. Sznajer Y, Saragoni C, Garavelli L, Van Maldergem L. Atypical Rothmund-Thomson syndrome in a patient with compound heterozygous mutations in RECQL4 gene and phenotypic features in RECQL4 syndromes. Eur J Pediatr. 2008;167(2):175-181.

XXI. Simon T, Kohlschuetter A, Bielack S, Langer T. Rothmund-Thomson syndrome and osteosarcoma: a review of the literature and report of two cases. Klin Padiatr. 2012;224(4):256-260.

XXII. Mills KD, Ferguson DO, Alt FW. The role of DNA breaks in genomic instability and tumorigenesis. Immunol Rev. 2003;194:77-95.

Most read articles by the same author(s)