Late Complications of Biopolymers in Aesthetic Medicine: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management

Main Article Content

Marisela Silva García
Cristian Sandoval Cervantes
Miguel A. Cervantes Guzmán

Abstract

Permanent biopolymers used as dermal fillers may cause delayed complications due to chronic foreign body inflammation, progressive fibrosis, and, in severe cases, systemic manifestations such as granulomatous hypercalcemia and renal impairment. Late complications may occur years after injection and range from localized nodules, induration, and deformity to material migration and systemic involvement, often mimicking infectious, neoplastic, or autoimmune conditions. Diagnosis relies on clinicoradiographic correlation, with magnetic resonance imaging playing a central role in defining disease extent and ultrasound serving as a useful adjunct for initial evaluation. Management should be individualized according to disease severity. Medical therapy has a limited role because of the persistence of the material, whereas surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment in moderate to severe disease despite challenges in complete resection. Early recognition, multidisciplinary evaluation, and severity-based management are essential to optimize clinical and aesthetic outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
Silva García, Marisela, Cristian Sandoval Cervantes, and Miguel A. Cervantes Guzmán. 2026. “Late Complications of Biopolymers in Aesthetic Medicine: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 6 (06):1105-10. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v6-i6-11.
Section
Articles

References

I. Brummund D, Chang A, Salgado C. Surgical management of biopolymer-induced granulomatous hypercalcemia and renal insufficiency: a case report and literature review. Eplasty. 2025;25:e19.

II. Hormaza-Jaramillo A, Peñaloza-González D, Benavides-Ibarra SA, Calvache-Hernández N, Muñoz-García LE, Hidalgo-Cardona A, et al. Severe complications due to biopolymers in a patient with autoimmune disease: a case report and review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2025;7:ojaf099. doi:10.1093/asjof/ojaf099

III. Ruiz-de-León G, Cortés-Eslava D, Hernández-Pacheco E, Serrera-Figallo MA, Torres-Lagares D, Baus-Domínguez M. Biopolymers in facial aesthetics: gel-based applications, safety, effectiveness, and future prospects: a systematic review. Gels. 2025;11(6):455. doi:10.3390/gels11060455

IV. Pachón-Suarez JE, Tello VZR, Cifuentes RCR, Cuadros AMP, Salazar MC. Biopolymers: histopathologic case series of patients with permanent synthetic fillers presenting chronic granulomatous reaction and hypercalcemia. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(10):e6159. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006159

V. Sampaio MMC, et al. The risks of polymethyl methacrylate: an integrative review of 587 complication reports. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2024;39(1).

VI. Vengalil N, Council LM, Michalski BM. Foreign body granulomas to polymethylmethacrylate soft tissue filler following COVID-19 infection. JAAD Case Rep. 2023;41:1–3. doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2023.08.037

VII. Chang YY, Wu MF, Yuan K, Wu YH. A foreign body granuloma is induced by a polymer membrane following guided bone regeneration surgery. J Dent Sci. 2022;17(4):1814–1816. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2022.08.015

VIII. Poveda R, Bagán JV, Murillo J, Jiménez Y. Granulomatous facial reaction to injected cosmetic fillers: a presentation of five cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11:E1–E5.

IX. Wang H, Wu D, Lo C, Liu S, Ji Q, Reem AA, et al. Foreign body granulomas reaction related to collagen stimulatory cosmetic fillers: a systematic review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025;24(10):e70459. doi:10.1111/jocd.70459

X. Mendoza-Muñoz N, Leyva-Gómez G, Piñón-Segundo E, Zambrano-Zaragoza ML, Quintanar-Guerrero D, Del Prado-Audelo ML, et al. Trends in biopolymer science applied to cosmetics. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2023;45(6):699–724. doi:10.1111/ics.12880

XI. Duarte A, Hedo A, Pradel J. Late complication after biopolymers injection in buttocks. Cir Plast Ibero-Latinoam. 2016;42(4).

XII. Díez-Pascual AM. Biopolymer composites 2022. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(7):6430. doi:10.3390/ijms24076430

XIII. Nguyen L, Schneider SW, Siemann-Harms U, Herberger K. Complications of dermal injectables: a retrospective study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026;25(1):e70582. doi:10.1111/jocd.70582

XIV. Beleznay K, Carruthers JD, Carruthers A, Mummert ME, Humphrey S. Delayed-onset nodules secondary to a smooth cohesive 20 mg/mL hyaluronic acid filler: cause and management. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(8):929–939. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000000418

XV. Signorini M, Liew S, Sundaram H, De Boulle KL, Goodman GJ, Monheit G, et al. Global aesthetics consensus: avoidance and management of complications from hyaluronic acid fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(6):961e–971e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002184

XVI. Urdiales-Gálvez F, De Cabo-Francés FM, Bové I. Ultrasound patterns of different dermal filler materials used in aesthetics. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(5):1541–1548. doi:10.1111/jocd.14032

XVII. Dua A, Bhardwaj B. Delayed onset nodules after hyaluronic acid fillers: a case series. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2022;15(1):91–94. doi:10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_200_20

XVIII. Horriat N, Woods TR, Medina A. An unusual and delayed complication of hyaluronic acid filler injection: a case report. Case Rep Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020;7(1):68–72. doi:10.1080/23320885.2020.1769481

Most read articles by the same author(s)