Evidence-Based Algorithm for Microtia Reconstruction in The Modern Era: Autologous, Alloplastic, and Prosthetic Approaches

Main Article Content

Denisse Sánchez Padilla
Mauricio Gerardo Martínez Morales
Rodrigo Alejandro Solis Reyna
Daniela Itzayana Jiménez Yépiz
Liliana Citlali Avelar Robledo
Fernando Miguel Jiménez Yépiz
Julio César Rangel Talamantes

Abstract

Microtia is a congenital malformation of the external ear that represents a complex reconstructive challenge due to the intricate three-dimensional anatomy of the auricle. This review provides a comprehensive and critical analysis of current reconstructive options including autologous costal cartilage reconstruction, alloplastic implants, and prosthetic rehabilitation. A structured narrative review of contemporary literature was performed. Autologous reconstruction remains the gold standard for long-term durability, while alloplastic and prosthetic approaches provide valuable alternatives in selected patients. An evidence-based algorithm is proposed to guide clinical decision-making.

Article Details

How to Cite
Denisse Sánchez Padilla, Mauricio Gerardo Martínez Morales, Rodrigo Alejandro Solis Reyna, Daniela Itzayana Jiménez Yépiz, Liliana Citlali Avelar Robledo, Fernando Miguel Jiménez Yépiz, and Julio César Rangel Talamantes. 2026. “Evidence-Based Algorithm for Microtia Reconstruction in The Modern Era: Autologous, Alloplastic, and Prosthetic Approaches”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 6 (05):857-61. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v6-i5-09.
Section
Articles

References

I. Hellies F, Smith J, Brown K. Contemporary outcomes in microtia reconstruction: a systematic review. Children (Basel). 2025;12(3):245–256.

II. Ronde EM, Mureau MAM, van der Hulst RRWJ. Auricular reconstruction: current concepts and future directions. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(9):2200–2210.

III. Reinisch JF, Tahiri Y, Khater M. Alloplastic auricular reconstruction: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Facial Plast Surg. 2025;41(2):123–132.

IV. Baluch N, Nagata S, Park C. Auricular reconstruction: embryology, classification, and surgical planning. Can J Plast Surg. 2014;22(1):39–45.

V. Brent B. Auricular repair with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: two decades of experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(3):355–374.

VI. Nagata S. A new method of total reconstruction of the auricle for microtia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(2):221–230.

VII. Park C. Updates in autologous ear reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023;76(4):987–995.

VIII. Kim J, Lee J, Park M. Outcomes of costal cartilage microtia reconstruction: a contemporary review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;77(1):45–53.

IX. You P, Chen W, Wang Y. Complications in porous polyethylene ear reconstruction: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;167(5):812–820.

X. Sun P, Xu L, Zhang Z. Long-term outcomes of Medpor auricular reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(6):e567–e572.

XI. Li CL, Chen S, Wang H. Comparative outcomes of autologous versus alloplastic auricular reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2024;134(2):412–420.

XII. Ku PKM, Tong MCF, van Hasselt CA. Implant-retained auricular prostheses: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2024;26(1):55–62.

XIII. Zopf DA, Mitsak AG, Flanagan CL. Computer-aided design and tissue engineering in auricular reconstruction. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21(1-2):285–295.

XIV. Zhou G, Jiang H, Yin Z. In vitro regeneration of patient-specific ear-shaped cartilage. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(3):271–279.

XV. Cao Y, Vacanti JP, Paige KT. Transplantation of chondrocytes utilizing a polymer-cell construct to produce tissue-engineered cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(2):297–302.

Most read articles by the same author(s)