Sural and Reverse Sural Flaps in Reconstruction: A Concise Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Sural-based flaps, including the reverse/distally based sural artery flap (RSAF) and the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap, remain widely used for distal lower-extremity and selected head-and-neck reconstruction due to reliable anatomy and acceptable morbidity.
Methods: A focused narrative review of systematic reviews, pooled analyses, large clinical series, and key anatomic studies was performed to summarize indications, outcomes, risk factors, and technical considerations.
Results: RSAF shows survival rates of approximately 95–97%, with venous congestion and partial necrosis as the most common complications. Smoking, venous insufficiency, advanced age, larger flap size, and heel location increase complication risk, whereas diabetes and peripheral vascular disease are not consistently associated with total flap loss. MSAP flaps provide thin, pliable tissue with low donor-site morbidity and survival rates near 96%. In head-and-neck and lower-extremity reconstruction, MSAP outcomes are comparable to other free flaps, with superior donor-site aesthetics but persistent risk of venous congestion.
Conclusions: RSAF remains a reliable workhorse for distal leg and foot defects, while MSAP offers a versatile perforator alternative with favorable donor-site outcomes when anatomy and expertise allow.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Daar DA, Rifkin WJ, Bickel KD, et al. Revisiting the reverse sural artery flap in distal lower extremity reconstruction: A systematic review and risk analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(4):460–470.
II. Al Omran Y, Al Qahtani A, Alshomer F, et al. The medial sural artery perforator flap versus other free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Plast Surg. 2022;49(3):289–298.
III. Karadaghy OA, et al. Medial sural artery perforator flap in head & neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025.
IV. Schmidt K, Jakob M, Kotsougiani D, et al. The reverse sural artery flap: How do modifications boost its reliability? A systematic analysis of the literature. JPRAS Open. 2020;25:70–79.
V. Follmar KE, Baccarani A, Baumeister SP, et al. The distally based sural flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(6):138–148.
VI. Bracho Ruíz ES, et al. Reverse sural flap for lower limb reconstruction: A literature review. SAR J Surg. 2023.
VII. Deek N, Wei FC, Mardini S. The medial sural artery perforator flap: Lessons learned from 200 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(4):653e–662e.
VIII. Sun Q, Wang Y, Liu J. Anatomical study and clinical application of medial sural artery perforator flap for oral cavity reconstruction. 2020.
IX. Al-Himdani S, Coolican M, Molloy A. The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap: A versatile flap for lower extremity reconstruction. Injury. 2020;51(2):495–502.
X. de Blacam C, Colakoglu S, Ogunleye AA, et al. Risk factors associated with complications in lower-extremity reconstruction with the distally based sural flap: A systematic review and pooled analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(5):607–616.
XI. Tripathee S, Basnet B, Yadav S. How safe is reverse sural flap? A systematic review. Eplasty. 2022;22:e19.
XII. Hashmi PM, Ahmad M, Khan M. Long-term clinical and functional outcomes of distally based sural artery flap: A retrospective case series. JPRAS Open. 2021;30:68–75.
XIII. Türker T, Yılmaz M, Erkan M. Hemodynamics in distally based sural flaps for lower leg reconstruction: A literature review. J Hand Microsurg. 2022;14(2):95–102.
XIV. Persaud S, Gill T, Younger A. Sural flap use for the treatment of wounds with underlying osteomyelitis: Graft size as a predictor of outcome—A systematic review. Foot Ankle Spec. 2017;10(3):254–261.
XV. Abualhaj S, et al. Reverse sural artery flap for lower extremity reconstruction: A multicenter retrospective analysis of success and failure patterns. J Orthop Traumatol. 2025;26(1):12.
XVI. Lin JA, et al. Review and algorithmic management of the anatomical variations of the medial sural artery perforator flap. J Hand Microsurg. 2025.
XVII. Gulati A, Singh M, Aggarwal A. Medial sural artery perforator flap—indications, tips and pitfalls. 2021.