Total Transanal Mesorectal Excision and Sphincter Preservation in Distal Rectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Intensive Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Strategies

Main Article Content

Alondra Cuadra Casillas
Juan Antonio Vazquez Rojo
Alexia Paola Rodríguez Barboza
Lina Sarahí de la Madrid Trevizo
Victor Manuel Campos Cruz
Humberto Emiliano Cordova Mata
David Bernardo García Noriega
Efrén Flores Tavizón

Abstract

The management of low rectal cancer, particularly tumors of the lower third, presents a persistent surgical challenge centered on the balance between oncological radicality and the preservation of continence and quality of life. Organ preservation strategies have emerged as a paradigm shift, moving beyond the historical standard of abdominoperineal resection. This comprehensive review examines the integrated role of intensive neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) regimens and total transanal mesorectal excision (TaTME) in facilitating sphincter-preserving resection for distal rectal carcinomas. We synthesize current evidence on the induction of pathological complete response (pCR) through dose-escalated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy, and its critical impact on surgical planning. The focus is on how the TaTME technique, with its enhanced distal visualization and precision in the deep pelvis, enables a more reliable assessment of tumor response and a technically optimized intersphincteric dissection. This manuscript analyzes the synergistic potential of these two approaches—aggressive nonsurgical cytoreduction and refined surgical access—to achieve clear circumferential and distal margins while preserving the sphincter complex. We discuss the implications of pCR as a surrogate for favorable long-term oncological outcomes and review the stringent patient selection, response assessment protocols, and functional considerations inherent to this multidisciplinary model. The evolving landscape of non-operative management is contextualized alongside definitive TaTME resection, providing a nuanced overview of contemporary organ-preserving pathways.

Article Details

How to Cite
Casillas, Alondra Cuadra, Juan Antonio Vazquez Rojo, Alexia Paola Rodríguez Barboza, Lina Sarahí de la Madrid Trevizo, Victor Manuel Campos Cruz, Humberto Emiliano Cordova Mata, David Bernardo García Noriega, and Efrén Flores Tavizón. 2026. “Total Transanal Mesorectal Excision and Sphincter Preservation in Distal Rectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Intensive Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Strategies”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 6 (02):216-20. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v6-i2-01.
Section
Articles

References

Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982;69:613-6.

Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, et al. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986;2:996-9.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050-9.

Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short- term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477-84.

Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1324-32.

Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015;314:1356-63.

Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, et al. Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2019;269:589-95.

Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015;314:1346-55.

Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, et al. Effect of Robotic- Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017;318:1569-80.

Raestrup H, Manncke K, Mentges B, et al. Indications and technique for TEM (transanal endoscopic microsurgery). Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1994;2:241-6.

Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:301-7.

de Lacy AM, Rattner DW, Adelsdorfer C, et al. Transanal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) rectal resection: "down-to-up" total mesorectal excision

(TME)--short-term outcomes in the first 20 cases. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3165-72.

Chen CC, Lai YL, Jiang JK, et al. The evolving practice of hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2015;29:119-26.

Heald RJ. A new solution to some old problems: transanal TME. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17:257-8.

Chen CC, Lai YL, Jiang JK, et al. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation:

A Matched Case-Control Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:1169-76.

Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, et al. Incidence and Risk Factors for Anastomotic Failure in 1594 Patients Treated by Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Results

From the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg 2019;269:700-11.

Most read articles by the same author(s)