Strategies for the Optimal Management of Prosthetic Valve Infective Endocarditis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PVIE) remains one of the most severe and challenging forms of endocarditis, characterized by high mortality, increasing diagnostic complexity, and evolving epidemiological patterns. Recent studies demonstrate rising incidence associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a greater burden of Staphylococcus aureus, and the emergence of new or re-emerging pathogens. Advances in imaging modalities and updated diagnostic criteria have strengthened the identification of peri-valvular complications, valve dysfunction, and atypical presentations. Additionally, growing evidence supports expanded therapeutic strategies, including suppressive antimicrobial therapy in patients who are not candidates for surgery. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes findings from recent clinical studies, systematic reviews, and observational analyses focused on PVIE, including pediatric and adult populations, TAVI-related infections, surgical and antimicrobial approaches, epidemiological trends, and outcomes. Only the articles specified in the reference list were used for extraction and integration of data. Results: Across reviewed studies, PVIE consistently demonstrated substantial morbidity and mortality, influenced by pathogen profile, prosthesis type, and presence of peri-annular complications. Comparative analyses revealed distinct microbiological and clinical characteristics between TAVI-associated and surgically implanted prostheses. While early surgery remains essential in hemodynamic compromise or uncontrolled infection, suppressive antimicrobial therapy emerged as a viable alternative for high-risk surgical candidates, with observational evidence supporting its use in selected cases. Epidemiological investigations showed dynamic shifts in causative organisms and regional differences in incidence. Multimodal imaging improved diagnostic accuracy and facilitated earlier therapeutic decision-making. Conclusion: Optimal management of PVIE requires an individualized, multidisciplinary approach integrating early diagnosis, tailored antimicrobial therapy, and timely surgical evaluation. Emerging data support the selective use of suppressive antimicrobial therapy in non-surgical candidates, while ongoing epidemiological changes and increasing TAVI utilization demand updated diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks. Continued research is essential to refine risk stratification and improve outcomes in this high-risk population.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Nappi F. Advancements and Challenges in the Management of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: A Review. Pathogens. 2024;13(12):1039. doi:10.3390/pathogens13121039
II. Nappi F. Infective Endocarditis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Narrative Review. Prosthesis. 2024;6(6):1529-1552. doi:10.3390/prosthesis6060110
III. Valsecchi P, Calia M, Giordani P, Giuliani C, Arcuri A, Scotti V, Seminari E, Bruno R. Navigating troubled waters: a systematic review of prosthetic valve endocarditis reported cases treated with suppressive antimicrobial treatment. Int J Infect Dis. 2025;158:107934.
doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107934
IV. Sebestyen A, Boisson M, Rhem D, Korabi M, Behouche A, Blanc M, Chavanon O. Treatment of left-sided prosthetic valve endocarditis by suppressive antibiotic therapy: A retrospective monocentric real-world study. Infectious Diseases Now. 2025;55(6):105112.
doi:10.1016/j.idnow.2025.105112
V. Dardari M, Cinteza E, Vasile CM, Padovani P, Vatasescu R. Infective Endocarditis among Pediatric Patients with Prosthetic Valves and Cardiac Devices: A Review and Update of Recent Emerging Diagnostic and Management Strategies. J Clin Med. 2023;12(15):4941.
doi:10.3390/jcm12154941
VI. Vasquez Torrico SI, Laube G. Risk factors for infectious endocarditis of prosthetic valves: a systematic review. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations.
;2:333.
VII. Jerónimo A, Olmos C, Zulet P, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis: comparison between transcatheter and surgical bioprostheses. Infection. 2024;52:2425-2434.
doi:10.1007/s15010-024-02302-0.
VIII. Amanov L, Athanasiou T, Schmack B, et al. Surgical therapy of infective prosthesis endocarditis following TAVI: a single center’s experience. Diagnostics. 2024;14(12):1259.
doi:10.3390/diagnostics14121259.
IX. Dingen H, Jordal S, Bratt S, et al. Clinical profile, microbiology and outcomes in infective endocarditis treated with aortic valve replacement: a multicenter case-control study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24:913. doi:10.1186/s12879-024-09782-3.
X. Reisinger M, Kachel M, George I. Emerging and re-emerging pathogens in valvular infective endocarditis: a review. Pathogens. 2024;13(7):543.
doi:10.3390/pathogens13070543.
XI. Jordal S, Kommedal Ø, Haaverstad R, et al. Epidemiological and microbial trends of infective endocarditis in Western Norway: a 7-year prospective observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24:702. doi:10.1186/s12879-024-09596-3.
XII. Diego-Yagüe I, Ramos-Martínez A, Muñoz P, et al. Clinical features and prognosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024;43:1989-2000. doi:10.1007/s10096-024-04848-1.
XIII. Editorial. Special issue: Infective endocarditis—what is new in the clinical research? J Clin Med. 2023;12(15):5064. doi:10.3390/jcm12155064.
XIV. Olmos C, Lancellotti P, et al. Novedades en la endocarditis infecciosa. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2024;77(9):779-787. doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2024.03.011.
XV. Poggio Pantte CL, Santa María M. Valvulitis aórtica protésica aislada: un nuevo criterio de endocarditis infecciosa. Rev Ecocar Pract. 2024;8(2). doi:10.37615/retic.v8n2a11.