Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy with Tubal Rupture and Hemodynamic Instability, Followed by Delayed Intrauterine Miscarriage: A Case Report

Main Article Content

María Belén Villanueva Ávila
Ramiro Aguilar Acuña
Javier Navarrete Ayora
María Fernanda Ibarra Guerrero
Alexis Emir Noguera Echeverría
Alhan Fernando Castillo Valencia
Reynaldo Martínez Borraz
Dulce María Mena Polanco

Abstract

Introduction: Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition, characterized by the simultaneous presence of an intrauterine and an ectopic gestation. Its diagnosis is challenging, particularly in patients without risk factors and in emergency settings where the presence of an intrauterine pregnancy may create a false sense of security. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 24-year-old nulliparous woman with no history of assisted reproduction who presented to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain and signs of hypovolemic shock. Physical examination revealed peritoneal irritation and hemodynamic instability. Transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated free fluid in the pelvis and a viable intrauterine gestational sac. Due to suspected obstetric acute abdomen, the patient underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy, which revealed a ruptured left tubal ectopic pregnancy with approximately 1500 mL of hemoperitoneum. A left salpingectomy was performed. Postoperatively, β-hCG levels initially declined but later rose, and follow-up ultrasound showed an intrauterine gestation without cardiac activity, consistent with missed abortion. Uterine evacuation was performed via manual vacuum aspiration without complications. Histopathology confirmed ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy and intrauterine products of conception. The patient recovered favorably with multidisciplinary follow-up. Discussion: This case highlights the diagnostic difficulty of spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy, particularly in reproductive-age women without classic risk factors. The presence of an intrauterine pregnancy does not exclude the coexistence of an ectopic gestation. Hemodynamic instability and hemoperitoneum remain decisive criteria for urgent laparotomy, especially in low-resource settings where laparoscopic management may be limited. Conclusion: Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy, although rare, should be considered in women presenting with acute abdomen, even when an intrauterine gestation has been confirmed. Early recognition, timely surgical intervention, and coordinated multidisciplinary management are essential to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality, particularly in facilities with limited diagnostic and surgical resources.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Villanueva Ávila, María Belén, Ramiro Aguilar Acuña, Javier Navarrete Ayora, María Fernanda Ibarra Guerrero, Alexis Emir Noguera Echeverría, Alhan Fernando Castillo Valencia, Reynaldo Martínez Borraz, and Dulce María Mena Polanco. 2025. “Spontaneous Heterotopic Pregnancy With Tubal Rupture and Hemodynamic Instability, Followed by Delayed Intrauterine Miscarriage: A Case Report”. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies 5 (12):1996-2002. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v5-i12-09.
Section
Articles

References

I. Gutiérrez, C. O., Romero, S. G., & Velasco, P. L. (2006). Embarazo heterotópico. Ginecol Obstet Mex, 74(7), 389–393.

II. Černiauskaitė, M., Vaigauskaitė, B., Ramašauskaitė, D., & Šilkūnas, M. (2020). Spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy: Case report and literature review. Medicina, 56(8), 365.

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56080365

III. Delgado Delgado, A. E., & Delgado Kalisch, A. (2019). Embarazo heterotópico. Acta Médica Grupo Ángeles, 17(1), 61–63. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from

https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-7203201900010006

IV. Elsayed, S., Farah, N., & Anglim, M. (2023). Heterotopic pregnancy: Case series and review of diagnosis and management. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023, 2124191.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2124191

V. Damián, L.-R., Corona, P., Navarro, A., & Samuel, J. (2011). Embarazo heterotópico: Reporte de dos casos y revisión de la literatura [PDF]. Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from https://femecog.org.mx/categoria5/CC-108.pdf

VI. Herrera Castañeda, E., Luna, G., Sejnaui Sayegh, J., Vacca Orrego, L. M., & Tobar Parra, J. M. (2025). Laparoscopic surgical alternative in the treatment of ruptured cornual heterotopic pregnancy: Case report. Colomb Med, 56(1), e5005576.

https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v56i1.5576

VII. Elsayed, S., Farah, N., & Anglim, M. (2023). Heterotopic pregnancy: Case series and review of diagnosis and management. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023, 2124191.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2124191

VIII. Luna, M. (2024). Embarazo heterotópico, un caso poco frecuente sobre el que actuar rápido. ABC.es. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from https://www.abc.es/salud/salud-al-dia/embarazo-heterotopico-poco-frecuente-sobre-actuar-rapido-20241210095549-nt.html

IX. Hernández Méndez, J. R., Luna Tovar, A., Noriega Usi, V. M., Tueme Izaguirre, J., Saucedo Moreno, E., & Valderrama Loyola, O. (2018). El cirujano general frente al embarazo heterotópico roto: Presentación de un caso y revisión de la literatura. Cir Gen, 40(1), 24–30. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from

https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-00992018000100024

X. Hochstatter Arduz, E., & Gonzales Vargas, A. (2020). Embarazo heterotópico: Reporte de un caso. Gac Médica Boliviana, 43(1), 97–99. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from

https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=445674690031

XI. Monzón Castillo, E. P., Tejada Martínez, G., & Oliva García, A. B. (2019). Embarazo heterotópico espontáneo: Presentación de dos casos. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet, 65(3), 355–359. Retrieved November 27, 2025, from

http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2304-51322019000300015

XII. Maleki, A., Khalid, N., Rajesh Patel, C., & El-Mahdi, E. (2021). The rising incidence of heterotopic pregnancy: Current perspectives and associations with in-vitro fertilization. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 266, 138–144.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.09.031

XIII. Larraín de la, C. D., Durruty, G. V., Pomés, C. C., & Cuello, F. M. (2007). Consideraciones para el uso de la laparoscopia durante el embarazo. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol, 72(4), 247–257. Retrieved November 14,2025, from

https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0717-75262007000400009

XIV. Reijnders-Boerboom, G. T. J. A., Albers, K. I., Jacobs, L. M. C., van Helden, E., Rosman, C., Díaz-Cambronero, O., et al. (2023). Low intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery, 109(5), 1400–1411.

https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000289

XV. Mendivil, C., Padrón, R., Miranda, J., & Silva, G. (2011). Embarazo heterotópico: Diagnóstico ecográfico temprano, manejo con laparoscopia: Reporte de un caso y revisión de la literatura. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol, 62(1), 98–103. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from

http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74342011000100013

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>