Reinforced Tension Line (RTL) Technique for Abdominal Wall Closure: A Suture-Based Alternative to Mesh Reinforcement
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Incisional hernia remains one of the most frequent complications after midline laparotomy, associated with significant morbidity, readmissions, and reoperations. Although small-bite suture techniques have reduced hernia rates, mechanical failure of the fascial closure remains an unresolved problem.
Objective: The reinforced tension line (RTL) technique was developed to enhance the biomechanical strength of abdominal wall closure by optimizing the distribution of tensile forces and preventing suture pull-through.
Methods and Evidence: The RTL method involves the placement of a longitudinal, nonabsorbable suture parallel to the primary fascial closure. This additional suture functions as a mechanical reinforcement line that redistributes peak tensile forces from the fascial edges into surrounding tissue. Recent randomized clinical trial data demonstrate that supplementing standard small-bite closure with an RTL suture significantly reduces the incidence of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy for colorectal cancer—from 21% with standard closure to 6% with RTL augmentation—without increasing wound complications or adverse events.
Results and Relevance: The RTL technique is especially useful when mesh reinforcement is contraindicated, such as in contaminated or emergent settings. It provides a cost-effective, mechanically sound, and biologically compatible alternative to mesh while maintaining a simple surgical workflow. However, mesh reinforcement remains superior for long-term prevention in high-risk elective cases.
Conclusion: RTL represents an innovative approach to fascial closure that enhances mechanical stability without introducing prosthetic material. Ongoing research is needed to define its long-term outcomes and applicability in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Wenzelberg, C. L., Rogmark, P., Ekberg, O., & Petersson, U. (2024). Reinforced tension-line suture after laparotomy: early results of the Rein4CeTo1 randomized clinical trial. British Journal of Surgery, 111(10), znae265.
II. Lozada Hernández, E. E., Flores González, E., Chavarría Chavira, J. L., Hernandez Herrera, B., Rojas Benítez, C. G., García Bravo, L. M., ... & Soria Rangel, J. (2024). The MESH-RTL Project for prevention of abdominal wound dehiscence (AWD) in high-risk patients: noninferiority, randomized controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 38(12), 7634-7646.
III. Lozada-Hernández, E. E., López-Briones, J. S., Martin del Campo, L. A., Fernández-Vazquez Mellado, L. A., Valenzuela Alpuche, H. A., Jean-Silver, E. R., ... & Carlos-Jimenez, S. (2025). Comparison of the levels of metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in serum and fascia in four methods of midline laparotomy closure: standard, small bites, reinforced tension line and onlay mesh (absorbable and non-absorbable). Experimental study. Journal of Surgical Protocols and Research Methodologies, 2025, snaf008.
IV. Lozada-Hernández, E. E., López-Briones, J. S., Martin del Campo, L. A., Fernández-Vazquez Mellado, L. A., Valenzuela Alpuche, H. A., Jean-Silver, E. R., ... & Carlos-Jimenez, S. (2025). Comparison of the levels of metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in serum and fascia in four methods of midline laparotomy closure: standard, small bites, reinforced tension line and onlay mesh (absorbable and non-absorbable). Experimental study. Journal of Surgical Protocols and Research Methodologies, 2025, snaf008.
V. van den Berg, R., Visscher, L., Menon, A. G., Deerenberg, E. B., & Tanis, P. J. (2025). Suture Techniques and Materials for Fascial Closure of Abdominal Wall Incisions: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Annals of Surgery Open, 6(1), e548.
VI. Wenzelberg, C., Petersson, U., Syk, I., Ekberg, O., & Rogmark, P. (2023). Abdominal closure with reinforcing suture decreases incisional hernia incidence after CRS/HIPEC. Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery, 2, 11188.
VII. Acuña Pinzón, C. L. (2023). Prevención de hernia incisional con técnica RTL (Reinforced Tension Line) comparada con el uso de malla profiláctica en laparotomía por línea media: seguimiento a 3 años del reporte inicial: ensayo clínico aleotarizado de no inferioridad.
VIII. Cuenca, O., Ferreira, R., Ferreira, J., Sosa, E., Agüero, A., Cano, C., & Díaz, J. R. (2025). Técnica de refuerzo de la pared abdominal con sutura longitudinal lateral a la incisión (reiforced tension line-RTL) para el cierre de la línea media como prevención de evisceración. Revista Cirugía Paraguaya, 49(1), 12-15.