A Review of Complications in Hostile Abdomen
Main Article Content
Abstract
A "hostile abdomen" refers to a challenging surgical scenario characterized by dense adhesions, scarring, and anatomical distortions resulting from previous surgeries, trauma, or pathological conditions. These factors significantly complicate reoperative procedures, increasing the risk of complications such as enterocutaneous and enteroatmospheric fistulas, small bowel obstruction, anastomotic leaks, and intra-abdominal infections. The etiology of a hostile abdomen commonly includes prior abdominal surgeries, damage control laparotomy, inflammatory diseases, and intra-abdominal infections, all of which contribute to the formation of extensive adhesions and fibrotic changes.
Managing a hostile abdomen requires a multidisciplinary approach, involving meticulous surgical planning and the use of advanced techniques such as biologic mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction. Surgeons must remain vigilant for complications, including sepsis, incisional hernias, and malignant bowel obstruction, which can significantly impact patient outcomes. Early identification and appropriate intervention are critical to reducing morbidity and improving postoperative recovery. As surgical advancements continue, further research is necessary to refine strategies for minimizing complications and optimizing the management of patients with a hostile abdomen.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Enterocutaneous Fistulas and a Hostile Abdomen: Reoperative Surgical Approaches. Latifi R, Joseph B, Kulvatunyou N, et al. World Journal of Surgery. 2012;36(3):516-23.doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1306-1.
II. Burden of Adhesions in Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery: Systematic Review and Met-Analysis. ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ, et al. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2013;347:f5588. doi:10.1136/bmj.f5588. Leading Journal
III. Adhesions Are the Major Cause of Complications in Operative Gynecology. Herrmann A, De Wilde RL. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2016;35:71-83.
doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.10.010.
IV. Consequences and Complications of Peritoneal Adhesions. van Goor H. Colorectal Disease : The Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. 2007;9 Suppl 2:25-34. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01358.x.
V. Independent Predictors of Enteric Fistula and Abdominal Sepsis After Damage Control Laparotomy: Results From the Prospective AAST Open Abdomen Registry. Bradley MJ, Dubose JJ, Scalea TM, et al. JAMA Surgery. 2013;148(10):947-54. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2514.
VI. Enterocutaneous Fistulas and a Hostile Abdomen: Reoperative Surgical Approaches. Latifi R, Joseph B, Kulvatunyou N, et al. World Journal of Surgery. 2012;36(3):516-23.doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1306-1.
VII. Mesothelial Cell Responses to Acute Appendicitis or Small Bowel Obstruction Reactive Ascites: Insights Into Immunoregulation of Abdominal Adhesion. Hausburg MA, Banton KL, Cassidy CD, et al. PloS One.2025;20(1):e0317056. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317056. New Research
VIII. Visceral to Subcutaneous Fat Area Ratio Predicts Severe Abdominal Adhesions in Definitive Surgery for Anastomotic Fistula After Small Intestine Resection. Yang F, Tian W, Luo S, et al. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):19063. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-69379-3.
IX. Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Following Abdominal Surgery in Young Children (≤ 3 Years): A Retrospective Analysis of Incidence and Risk Factors Using Multivariate Cox Regression. Eeftinck Schattenkerk LD, Musters GD, Hamming G, et al. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2022;57(9):55-60. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.12.029.
X. Natural History and Management of Small-Bowel Obstruction in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Mor E, Shemla S, Assaf D, et al. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2022;29(13):8566-8579. doi:10.1245/s10434-022-12370-x.